
Grand in Paris subway, a big 8 which allows the state to negotiate contracts territorial development around future stations network through its Society of Greater Paris, which allows it to expand the parameters of the operations of national interest. Thus builds a Greater Paris is going reflections architects like from the perspective of its people through negotiations between senior officials and felted elected more or less reluctant
Dupart and Michel Cantal several team members have made the bridge during a debate that the magazine summed Urban Strokes: "Researchers, authors of most studies are the big losers of the consultation. Why? Because that from the outset, the exhibition project reigned supreme. Strange when one considers that the formation of a group combining researchers and architects was "the" requirement to serve on teams consulted. The political and economic issues they have led to use these teams to "seduce" the Paris region, giving priority to image the time of great communication, and then to exclude and silence those teams? The state would retain it so that Peter Mansat calls "the emergence of a legitimate and effective will the true scale of the metropolis Paris?
Today the ten teams make up the scientific committee of the State Secretariat development of the Capital Region. Except that they never meet are no longer invited and none of them knows how it works ... "We are like watercress around the leg" director Guy Burgel. The "leg", it would be shared between a few large investors, such as Bouygues Immobilier, who now have their own scientific board and realize the great land acquisitions that will ensure a leading role in the project of Greater Paris.
more optimistic, Michel Cantal-Dupart think, anyway, the debate starts, even a "steamroller" could not stop it. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment